All humans have lived experiences that provide them with specific insights. In the context of public health, the engagement of “people with lived experience” aims to identify and amplify those voices, being inclusive of those heard less often.
Watch the video below to start your learning and then access the links to use the Ready-Set-Go approach to deepen your knowledge and skills.
People can only offer relevant experience if they have a clear understanding of the issue(s) and the specific ask. It is easier for a team to make progress when everyone starts on the same page.
What, when, why:
What?
What is the project?
What is the goal?
What is the scope of the project?
Over describe and be abundantly clear. Provide a clear description, using plain language and spell out any acronyms.
When?
Time commitment
Dates
Duration of involvement
Where?
In-Person or Online
Location
Engagement
Type of Engagement:
Inform/Educate
Gather
Discuss
Involve
Partner
Categories and Definition/Methods of Engagement:
Partner: An ongoing joint venture, involving people in every aspect of decision-making - from the early stages of defining the problems to developing and selecting the most promising solutions. People with lived experience are full partners with program staff. They are fully engaged from the start of a discussion around policy, programming, implementation, etc.
Examples include members of a team, governance boards, and improvement initiative work groups.
Involve: People play an important role in innovation/quality improvement efforts, but are still viewed as "advisory," with no role in decision-making. People with lived experience are advisors to program.
They are provided program challenges to problem solve.
Examples include Advisory Councils, world café and town halls.
Discuss: Providing information so that people can respond with their viewpoint. The team commits to consider the input, not to incorporate people's perspectives into ultimate decisions and strategies. People with lived experience and staff discuss issues. The program provides opportunities for input and programs. The input is used in the program or activities. Typically input is offered through discussions which include give and take with opportunity for clarification.
Examples include focus group, interviews and discussions.
Gather: Collecting information from people and listening to their insights. People with lived experience are informers. Their input is solicited through opportunities to provide feedback.
Input may not always be incorporated.
Examples include surveys, interviews, and suggestion boxes.
Inform/Educate: Communicating to the people you serve, and educating them about innovation efforts.
People with lived experience are recipients of information and education. They are informed about the program and activities.
Examples include brochures, posters, and newsletters.
Method of Engagement:
Interview
Survey
Feedback panel
Retreat
Focus group
Meeting
World Café
Town hall
Webinar with Q&A
Advisory committee
Be part of a work team
Engagement Methods
Inform/Educate:
High Touch
Face-to-face education
Newsletter
Brochure
Posters
High Tech
Website
Mass Media
Email/ Texts
Social Media
Gather
High Touch
Face-to-face inquiries
Suggestion boxes
In-person interview
Shadowing
Mystery shopping
High Tech
Electronic surveys
Phone interview
Webinars with Q&A
Discuss
High Touch
Targeted meetings to clarify input
Focus group
1:1 in-person discussion
High Tech
Google hangouts
1:1 phone discussion
Online forums
Involve
High Touch
On-going feedback panels
People occasionally join program meetings
Town halls
World Café
High Tech
Virtual town halls
Panels via video conferencing
Partner
High Touch
People join ongoing program meetings
People learn content and help decide what changes to make
Retreats
High Tech
Use collaborative documents
Use video conferencing
Invitation
Support Provided?
Logistics
Compensation
Staff support
How to Ask?
Letter
PSA (Public Service Announcement)
Social Media
Phone call
Email
Over lunch
Why Me?
What experience are you asking me to share?
How is this information going to be used?
What skills are you seeking?
Linking to the MCH Leadership Competencies. Understanding how to specifically ask PWLE is a key component of the skills section of the MCH Leadership Competencies. Click the links below to access trainings that support the related sub-competencies.
8S6: Collaborate with organizations that are led by people with lived experience to build and deepen involvement across all MCH programs.
8S7 Use feedback from people with lived experience, and community members, obtained through focus groups, surveys, community advisory boards, and other mechanisms as part of the project's continuous quality improvement efforts. Monitor and assess the program overall for effectiveness of partnerships between professionals and people with lived experience.
Implementation. Remember, the key to effective partnerships with PWLE:
Shared decision making, involving self-advocates and/or the family, in planning and implementing activities.
Addressing the priorities of people with lived experience using a strengths-based approach.
Recognizing the agency of self-advocates in decision-making as they approach transition age, and across the lifespan.
Connecting people with lived experience to needed services.
Acknowledging that the effects of the SDOH, and broader systems of care, greatly impact individuals with special health care needs and developmental disabilities.
Participatory Planning: Improving Your Community Engagement Efforts. Year Developed: 2019. Source: APA Chapters & Divisions. Presenter(s): Alison LeFlore, Michelle Moon, Claudia Paraschiv, Adrianne Schaefer Borrego. Type: Webinar. Level: Introductory. Length: 90 minutes.
Creating Inclusive & Anti-Ableist Triage Policies. Year Developed: 2023. Source: Disability Rights New York. Presenter(s): Laura Guidry-Grimes, Katie Savin, and David Whalen. Type: Webinar. Level: Introductory. Length: 60 minutes.
This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number UE8MC25742; MCH Navigator for $225,000/year. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.